Pretty sure this was meant for me... srry.

Now 250x539 and no text (except for whats included in the image, and Motortopia adds their own stilly water mark).

Reading above requirements I think I am now in compliance, please let me know if I need to do anything else.

I plead ignorance.

I like Twilight.

And actually Mater is a test subject, unknowingly of course.

His sig block is 2 images side by side that total 845 px, which breaks our new guidelines. However, his height is only 199px and his sig block looks very conservative and clean now imo.

Because of this, I would like to extend our max length of images (or combined images) to 900 px because I don't see this causing an issue with anybody's browser (no extra side scrolling required).

That would make our max size 900px long X 250px high. I would like some feedback though before I go changing the guidelines already.

Otherwise, we'll have to hunt Mater down with pitchforks and torches and make him change his sig again, lol!

That was the big problem. We had a few pics that were upwards of 500px tall and a few that had lots of stacked text.

When you consider the average (most used) computer resolution is 1024x768, that's a serious chunk of the screen devoted to somebody's personal pic. Yes, you have the option not to display sigs under the UserCP, but I like people's sigs and use alot of them to identify people quickly.

i'll bring the torches!!!!

LET'S GO GET HIM!

I like Twilight.